Bonsai vs Dubsado pricing breakdown
Bonsai and Dubsado use different pricing models that change the math at different team sizes.
Bonsai Pricing (2026)
- Basic ($9/user/mo annual): Time tracking, task management, CRM, and client portal. No proposals or contracts.
- Essentials ($19/user/mo annual): Adds proposals, contracts, scheduling, and integrations. The plan most solo freelancers need.
- Premium ($29/user/mo annual): Adds Gantt charts, workload view, and custom fields.
- Elite ($49/user/mo annual): Adds permissions, timesheet locking, and expense markup.
Dubsado Pricing (2026, updated December 2025)
- Starter ($20/mo): Invoicing, forms, templates. Limited to 3 users. No workflow automation, no CSS customization, no public scheduling.
- Premier ($40/mo): Adds automation, public scheduling, CSS customization, and appointment scheduling. Still limited to 3 users.
- Additional users: $25/month for 4-10 users on either plan.
- Free trial: 3 clients, unlimited time to explore features.
The pricing math for teams
Solo freelancer: Bonsai Essentials ($19/month) vs Dubsado Premier ($40/month). Bonsai costs less but has fewer automation options. 3-person team: Bonsai Essentials = $57/month vs Dubsado Premier = $40/month. At 3+ team members, Dubsado costs less per person. But both require separate project management tools, adding $10-25/month to either stack. Plutio starts at $19/month with no per-user fees, covering proposals, projects, time tracking, and invoicing in one subscription.
Which tool is better for your workflow?
The choice between Bonsai and Dubsado depends on how much time the team has for setup and how complex the intake process needs to be.
Quick start for basic needs
Bonsai has pre-built templates that most freelancers use to send proposals and invoices within hours. The trade-off is limited customization, and project management stops at basic task lists. For freelancers who run a standard proposal-contract-invoice flow for every project, Bonsai covers the pattern without configuration. But once the contract is signed, project tracking happens in a separate app.
Complex intake automation
Dubsado has conditional forms and rule-based triggers for multi-step intake sequences. The automation covers more trigger options than Bonsai, but building and maintaining workflows takes weeks and requires ongoing upkeep when requirements change. For service businesses with multiple intake paths, like a photographer offering mini sessions, full sessions, and wedding packages with different questionnaires for each, Dubsado's conditional forms route clients through the right sequence. The setup cost is 20-40 hours of initial configuration.
US tax preparation
Bonsai includes US tax prep with 1099-ready bookkeeping, expense categorization, and tax summaries. Dubsado has no tax features at all. For US-based freelancers, Bonsai's tax tools save $200-500/year in accountant fees for basic tax preparation. The limitation: tax features are US-only and don't cover state-level compliance for all jurisdictions.
Project-based client work
Neither tool covers project management after the intake phase. Bonsai has task lists with due dates. Dubsado added a Kanban view in v3.0. But neither has task dependencies, subtasks, or time tracking that connects to invoicing. Freelancers who spend more time doing client work than configuring intake workflows still need Trello, Asana, or a platform like Plutio for actual project tracking.
Teams and agencies
Dubsado includes 3 users at $40/month, making per-person cost lower for small teams. Bonsai's per-user pricing at $19/user means a 3-person team pays $57/month. For agencies with 5+ team members, Dubsado's additional user cost ($25/month per user for seats 4-10) and Bonsai's per-user model both add up quickly. Neither platform has team collaboration features like shared task boards, workload views, or team-level time reporting that agencies typically need.
What both tools are missing
Bonsai and Dubsado share the same fundamental limitation: both stop at the intake and paperwork phase.
No real project management
Both tools focus on the intake phase. Bonsai has basic task lists. Dubsado added a Kanban view in v3.0, but there are still no Gantt charts, task dependencies, or timeline visibility. Once the contract is signed, project context gets rebuilt in a separate app. For freelancers running 5+ concurrent projects, the lack of cross-project visibility means deadlines get missed and workload is impossible to balance without a dedicated tool.
No time tracking that feeds invoicing
Neither tool tracks time natively at the task level. Bonsai has basic time tracking on the dashboard, but tracked hours don't connect to specific tasks or flow into invoices automatically. A freelancer billing 15 clients per month spends 2-3 hours per billing cycle copying time entries from Toggl or Clockify into Bonsai or Dubsado invoices. Across a year, that manual transfer adds 25-35 hours of pure admin. Platforms with task-level time tracking that flows into invoices eliminate those steps.
No client portal for project progress
Dubsado has a basic client portal for viewing documents and invoices. Bonsai's portal covers document access. Neither offers a portal where clients can see project progress, approve deliverables, or access organized files by project. For agencies and consultants who need clients to check project status without sending email updates, both platforms require manual status communication. Platforms like Plutio include client portals with project visibility on a custom domain.
Dated interface (Dubsado)
Dubsado's v3.0 update improved the interface, but CSS knowledge is still needed for form customization beyond basic settings. Bonsai has a cleaner layout but remains focused on paperwork rather than ongoing project work. Neither platform has the modern drag-and-drop experience that tools like ClickUp or Plutio offer for task management.
What users do when neither tool is enough
When Bonsai or Dubsado can't handle the full workflow, users either build multi-tool stacks or switch to an all-in-one platform.
The typical workaround stack
Most freelancers end up assembling something like this:
- Bonsai or Dubsado for intake and invoicing ($19-40/month)
- Trello, Asana, or ClickUp for project management ($0-25/month)
- Toggl, Clockify, or Harvest for time tracking ($0-12/month)
- Google Drive or Dropbox for file storage and sharing ($0-15/month)
The total stack runs $30-90/month for a solo freelancer, with 3-4 logins to manage and constant manual data transfer between apps. When a contract gets signed in Dubsado, someone manually creates a project in Trello, sets up time tracking in Toggl, then copies completed hours back into a Dubsado invoice when the work is done.
The hidden cost: handoff time
Subscription costs are visible. The hidden cost is workflow friction. Each handoff between tools takes 5-15 minutes. Across 20-30 client projects per year, 25-50 hours go into data transfer that connected software handles automatically. A freelancer earning $100/hour loses $2,500-5,000/year in billable time on manual handoffs alone.
The one-platform alternative
All-in-one platforms connect proposals, projects, time tracking, and invoicing in a single system. The trade-off is learning a new tool versus maintaining the existing stack. For users who spent more time configuring Dubsado workflows or managing tool handoffs than doing client work, switching to one platform recovers 3-5 hours weekly.
What one platform looks like
Plutio covers the complete workflow. Proposals become projects automatically when clients approve. Tasks live in Kanban boards or list views. Time tracking happens at the task level, and the hours flow directly into invoice line items. Clients access a branded portal on a custom domain to check status and pay. One subscription at $19/month, one login, one connected system.
Final verdict
Both tools cover different parts of the intake phase but leave project management to other apps. The choice depends on whether speed or automation depth matters more, and whether the gaps in project management, time tracking, and client portals are deal-breakers.
Bonsai makes sense when:
- Proposals and invoices need to go out today. Bonsai has pre-built templates that work in hours. But project management stops at basic task lists, so actual work still happens in a separate tool like Trello or Asana.
- US tax preparation matters. Bonsai includes 1099-ready bookkeeping and expense categorization. But the per-user pricing at $19/month for Essentials adds up fast for teams, and the tax features only cover US federal preparation.
- Conditional forms and CSS customization aren't needed for the workflow. Bonsai's template-based approach works for standard proposal-contract-invoice sequences. But that also means less control over client-facing intake forms when different service types need different intake paths.
Dubsado makes sense when:
- Conditional workflows and CSS form customization are core requirements. Dubsado has rule-based triggers and multi-step sequences that route different inquiry types through different paths. But setup takes weeks, and workflows break when requirements change or the platform updates.
- Automation depth matters more than speed. Dubsado covers more trigger options than Bonsai, including conditional branching based on form responses. But the learning curve is steep enough that many users never finish configuring it, and the December 2025 price increase raised costs significantly.
- The team has 3+ members. Dubsado includes 3 users at $20/month (Starter) or $40/month (Premier). But project management is still minimal even after the v3.0 Kanban update, and additional users beyond 3 cost $25/month each.
Consider Plutio if:
- You spend more time doing project work than configuring intake.
- You want proposals to automatically create connected projects.
- You need a modern, branded client portal experience.
The bottom line: Bonsai is for fast onboarding and US tax prep. Dubsado is for complex workflow automation. But if you're tired of rebuilding projects in separate tools after every signed contract, Plutio connects the entire workflow for $19/month.
Research & Sources
The Bonsai vs Dubsado comparison is based on official documentation, hands-on testing, and analysis of user feedback across multiple review platforms. All data verified January 2026.
Research methodology
Both tools were evaluated through active accounts, official feature documentation, and analysis of user reviews across G2, Capterra, and TrustRadius. The focus was on common pain points from 1-3 star reviews where users share honest limitations rather than promotional praise. Pricing data was verified directly from official pricing pages.
Platform ratings (January 2026)
- Bonsai: 4.4/5 on G2 (500+ reviews). Praised for fast onboarding and tax features. Criticized for basic project management, limited customization, and per-user pricing that adds up for teams.
- Dubsado: 4.3/5 on G2 (800+ reviews). Praised for automation depth and form customization. Criticized for steep learning curve, weeks of setup time, and the December 2025 price increase.
- Plutio: 4.6/5 on G2 (200+ reviews). Praised for all-in-one coverage, white-labeling, and connected workflow from proposals to invoicing.
Common user complaints (from 1-3 star reviews)
Bonsai users frequently mention: basic project management, limited automation options, per-user pricing model, and occasional payment processing delays.
Dubsado users frequently mention: steep learning curve, workflows breaking after updates, dated interface before v3.0, and the December 2025 price increase catching existing users off guard.
Pricing sources (verified January 2026)
If you find any inaccuracies or outdated information, please let us know so we can investigate and update.
