Monday.com vs Trello pricing breakdown
Monday.com and Trello use per-user pricing, but the cost structure is very different. Monday.com requires a 3-user minimum on paid plans. Trello has a free tier that covers up to 10 users.
Monday.com Pricing (2026)
- Free: Up to 2 users. Limited to 3 boards, basic Kanban, and 500 items.
- Basic: $9/user/month (3-user minimum, billed annually). Unlimited boards, 5 GB storage, prioritized support.
- Standard: $12/user/month (annual). Adds timeline and Gantt views, 250 automations/month, 250 integrations/month, guest access.
- Pro: $19/user/month (annual). Time tracking, chart view, formula column, 25,000 automations/month, 25,000 integrations/month.
- Enterprise: Custom pricing. SAML SSO, audit logs, granular permissions, 250,000 automations/month.
Trello Pricing (2026)
- Free: Unlimited boards, up to 10 users per workspace, 1 Power-Up per board, 10 MB attachment limit.
- Standard: $5/user/month (annual). Unlimited Power-Ups, 1,000 workspace command runs/month, custom fields, checklists with due dates and assignees.
- Premium: $10/user/month (annual). Dashboard view, timeline view, calendar view, workspace-level templates, collections, priority support.
- Enterprise: $17.50/user/month (annual, 50-user minimum). Organization-wide permissions, attachment restrictions, free SSO.
The real cost: what teams actually pay
The pricing gap between these two tools is meaningful. A 10-person team on Monday.com Standard costs $120/month. The same team on Trello Standard costs $50/month. On Monday.com Pro (for time tracking), the cost jumps to $190/month. Since neither platform handles proposals, contracts, or invoicing, most teams add separate tools:
- Invoicing: QuickBooks, FreshBooks, or Xero ($15-55/month)
- Proposals and contracts: PandaDoc, Proposify, or DocuSign ($19-49/month)
- Client communication: Slack or dedicated client portal ($0-15/month)
- Time tracking (for Trello users): Toggl or Harvest ($0-12/month per user)
A typical multi-tool stack runs $80-200 per month for a small team, on top of the project management subscription. All-in-one platforms like Plutio start at $19/month for solo users with proposals, projects, time tracking, and invoicing in one subscription with no per-user fees.
The verdict: Trello is significantly cheaper for teams that only need Kanban boards. Monday.com costs more but includes views, automations, and time tracking that Trello charges for through Power-Ups. Both require separate billing and client management tools, which inflates the total cost beyond either platform's sticker price.
Which tool fits your team type?
The choice between Monday.com and Trello depends on project complexity, team size, and whether the work involves client billing or purely internal task management.
Small teams with simple projects
Trello's free plan covers up to 10 users, so a 3-5 person team managing straightforward task lists (marketing campaigns, content calendars, sprint boards) pays nothing. Most teams start using boards within minutes. Monday.com's free plan caps at 2 users, so small teams hit a paywall faster. For teams where "To Do, In Progress, Done" covers the entire workflow, Trello's lack of features is not an issue, but the moment the team needs Gantt charts, time tracking, or dashboards, that free plan stops being enough.
Growing teams with multiple projects
Monday.com has the features for this scenario, but at a cost. Once a team manages 5+ concurrent projects, the need for cross-board dashboards, Gantt charts, and automated status updates outgrows Trello's single-board Kanban view. Monday.com's Standard plan ($12/user/month) adds timeline views, guest access, and 250 automations/month, though that automation cap runs out by mid-month for active teams. Monday.com has 200+ integrations, but each integration run also counts against the automation limit.
Freelancers and agencies with client work
Neither tool covers the full workflow, because both Monday.com and Trello handle task tracking but freelancers and agencies also need proposals, contracts, time tracking tied to billing, and invoicing. Adding PandaDoc for proposals, QuickBooks for invoicing, and Toggl for time tracking means three extra subscriptions and constant data copying. Platforms with built-in project management, proposals, and invoicing handle the entire client lifecycle without a multi-tool stack.
Software development teams
Trello connects natively to Jira and Confluence through Atlassian. Teams already using those tools get direct integrations that Monday.com does not offer natively. Trello boards handle sprint planning, bug tracking, and feature backlogs at smaller scales, though reporting remains minimal. Monday.com offers a dev-specific product (monday dev) with sprint management, but teams embedded in the Atlassian ecosystem rarely switch. For development teams that also handle client-facing deliverables, neither platform covers the billing side.
Enterprise and large organizations
Monday.com includes SAML SSO, SCIM provisioning, audit logs, and organization-wide dashboards on Enterprise plans. Trello Enterprise exists but its board-based architecture makes portfolio-level visibility challenging without workarounds. Large organizations that need both project governance and cross-department reporting end up on Monday.com's Enterprise tier. The cost at scale ($19/user/month x 50+ users) is substantial, and that price covers only project management, not invoicing, proposals, or client portals.
What both tools are missing
Monday.com and Trello both handle project and task management. But when the work involves clients, neither tool handles the business operations that surround every project: proposals, contracts, invoicing, and client communication.
No proposals or contracts
Neither Monday.com nor Trello can create, send, or manage proposals or contracts. For service businesses, every project starts with a proposal and a signed agreement. Those documents live in separate tools like PandaDoc, Proposify, or DocuSign. When a proposal gets approved, someone manually creates the corresponding project board and copies scope details by hand. Platforms with built-in proposals and contracts connect the signed agreement directly to the project, so scope details carry over automatically.
No invoicing or payment processing
Neither platform generates invoices. Monday.com tracks time on Pro plans, but turning those hours into a client invoice requires exporting data to QuickBooks, FreshBooks, or a separate billing tool. Trello does not even have time tracking natively. For any business that bills clients, the project management tool and the billing tool are always disconnected. Status updates in the project board do not trigger invoices, completed milestones do not generate billing events, and payment status does not appear on the project dashboard.
No client portal
Monday.com offers guest access (Standard plan and above) where external users can view specific boards. But guests see the Monday.com interface, not a branded client portal. Trello has no guest or client-facing access on free plans. Neither platform offers white-labeled portals where clients see the business's brand, access project updates, view documents, and pay invoices in one place. Agencies and freelancers who need clients to self-serve on project updates, document approvals, and payments need a dedicated client portal tool on top of the project board.
Time tracking gaps
Monday.com includes time tracking only on Pro plans ($19/user/month). Trello has no native time tracking at all. Neither platform connects tracked hours to billing rates, calculates revenue per project, or generates timesheets that clients can approve. For hourly billing, the workflow is: track time in the project tool (or a separate timer), export the data, import into an invoicing tool, and manually create the invoice. Across 10-15 client projects per month, the manual transfer adds 2-4 hours of admin work. Task-level time tracking with invoice integration removes those handoffs entirely.
No scheduling or booking
Neither tool includes appointment scheduling or calendar booking. Consultants, coaches, and service providers who schedule client meetings use Calendly, Acuity, or a similar tool alongside their project board. Meeting details do not appear on the project timeline, and there is no connection between a booked session and a billable time entry. Platforms with built-in scheduling connect bookings to projects and billing in one workflow.
What teams do when neither tool is enough
When Monday.com or Trello cannot handle the full client workflow alone, teams take one of two paths: build a multi-tool stack and manage the manual handoffs, or move to a platform designed for the complete client lifecycle.
The typical workaround stack
Most service teams end up assembling something like this:
- Monday.com or Trello for project management ($0-19/user/month)
- PandaDoc or Proposify for proposals and contracts ($19-49/month)
- QuickBooks, FreshBooks, or Xero for invoicing ($15-55/month)
- Toggl or Harvest for time tracking ($0-12/user/month)
- Calendly or Acuity for scheduling ($0-20/month)
- Google Drive or Dropbox for file sharing ($0-15/month)
That is five or six subscriptions totaling $100-250 per month for a small team, with five or six logins to manage and constant manual data transfer between each tool.
The hidden cost: time spent on handoffs
The subscription cost is the visible expense. The hidden cost is the workflow friction. When a proposal gets signed in PandaDoc, someone has to manually create a project in Monday.com, set up a Toggl project for time tracking, then copy completed hours into QuickBooks when the work is done. Each handoff takes 5-15 minutes. Across 15-20 client projects per year, that is 25-50 hours annually spent on data transfer between platforms.
The all-in-one alternative
All-in-one platforms exist that handle proposals, project management, time tracking, and invoicing in a single system. The question is whether learning a new interface is worth it versus maintaining an existing multi-tool setup. For teams who have invested time building Monday.com automations or Trello board templates, migration feels like starting over. For teams already juggling five apps and spending hours on handoffs, switching to one platform can recover 3-5 hours per week.
What switching to one platform looks like
If the workflow spans proposals, task tracking, time tracking, and billing: Plutio is one platform that covers the complete workflow. Proposals convert into projects with Kanban boards. Time tracking happens at the task level and flows directly into invoice line items. Clients access a portal on a custom domain, not the software vendor's. The comparison table below shows exactly where Plutio fills the gaps that Monday.com and Trello leave open, and where each platform falls short.
Final verdict: Monday.com vs Trello
Monday.com and Trello are both project management tools that approach the same problem differently. Monday.com has more views and configuration options. Trello takes less time to configure and has fewer features to manage. Neither one handles the business side of client work.
Monday.com makes sense when:
- The team needs multiple project views (Gantt, timeline, calendar) beyond Kanban boards. Monday.com offers 7+ views per board with task dependencies, but each view requires configuration time per board.
- Automations need to handle status changes, notifications, and integration triggers. Pro plans include 25,000 automations/month, but Standard plans cap at 250 and stop running once the limit is hit.
- Cross-project dashboards are necessary for reporting to stakeholders. Monday.com pulls metrics from multiple boards into a single view, but only on Pro plans and above.
- The organization needs enterprise governance: SSO, audit logs, and role-based permissions, though these are locked behind the highest pricing tier.
The trade-off: Pricing starts at $27/month minimum (3-user requirement on Basic). Time tracking only exists on Pro plans ($19/user/month). There is no invoicing, no proposals, and no client portal. A 10-person team on Pro pays $190/month before adding billing and proposal tools.
Trello makes sense when:
- Kanban boards cover the workflow and the team does not need Gantt charts, dashboards, or automation beyond basic rules. Trello boards load fast, but anything beyond drag-and-drop cards requires Power-Ups.
- Budget matters and the free plan (10 users, unlimited boards) covers core needs, though the free tier limits Power-Ups to one per board and automation to 1,000 runs/month.
- The team is in the Atlassian ecosystem and uses Jira and Confluence alongside project boards, though Trello's own reporting remains minimal even on paid plans.
- Projects follow a straightforward task flow without dependencies or multi-phase timelines, because Trello has no task dependency tracking at all.
The trade-off: There is no Gantt view natively, no time tracking, no dashboards across boards, and anything beyond basic Kanban requires Power-Ups. Premium plan ($10/user/month) is needed for views that Monday.com includes at lower tiers.
Consider switching to an all-in-one platform if:
- The workflow includes proposals, contracts, time tracking, and invoicing alongside project boards, and those currently live in separate tools.
- Manual data transfer between project management, time tracking, and billing tools adds hours of admin per week.
- Client-facing work needs a branded portal, not the project tool's interface.
- Per-user pricing across multiple tools makes the total cost unjustifiable for the team size.
- The business is growing and needs one system where finishing a project triggers invoicing automatically.
The reality: Switching means learning a new system and migrating existing data. For most teams, migration takes a focused weekend. The ongoing time savings typically recover that investment within two to three weeks.
The bottom line: Monday.com has more views, automations, and dashboards, but per-user pricing and missing client tools add up. Trello takes less time to configure and has a free tier, but lacks Gantt charts, time tracking, and reporting. Both handle task management well but stop there. Proposals, contracts, invoicing, and client portals happen in other apps. If the workflow already spans multiple tools and the handoffs between them feel like wasted time, the comparison table below shows how all-in-one platforms like Plutio stack up against both.
Research & Sources
The Monday.com vs Trello comparison above is based on official documentation review, pricing page verification, and analysis of user feedback across review platforms. All data was verified in February 2026.
Research methodology
Each tool was evaluated through official feature documentation, pricing pages, and analysis of user reviews across G2, Capterra, and Trustpilot. The focus was on common pain points from lower-rated reviews where users share honest limitations rather than promotional praise.
Platform ratings (February 2026)
- Monday.com: 4.7/5 on G2 (12,000+ reviews), noted for views and automations, criticized for per-user pricing and complexity for small teams.
- Trello: 4.4/5 on G2 (13,000+ reviews), noted for simplicity and free tier, criticized for limited reporting and feature gaps beyond Kanban.
- Plutio: 4.6/5 on G2 (200+ reviews), praised for all-in-one coverage and white-labeling.
Common user complaints (from 1-3 star reviews)
Monday.com users frequently mention: "Per-user pricing gets expensive fast," "Too many features create confusion during setup," "Automation limits on Standard plan are too low," "No built-in invoicing for client work"
Trello users frequently mention: "Outgrew the Kanban-only approach quickly," "Reporting is basically nonexistent," "Need Power-Ups for basic features like custom fields," "No time tracking without add-ons"
Pricing sources (verified February 2026)
- Monday.com: Official pricing page
- Trello: Official pricing page
- Plutio: Official pricing page
Feature verification
- Monday.com G2 reviews (12,000+ reviews)
- Trello G2 reviews (13,000+ reviews)
- Monday.com Help Center
- Trello Help Center
If any information here is inaccurate or outdated, please let us know so we can investigate and update.
