Trello vs Asana pricing breakdown
Both tools offer generous free tiers that suit solo users, but the real cost differences emerge the moment you need advanced project views or automation.
Trello Pricing (2026)
- Free: Includes unlimited cards and up to 10 boards per workspace, which covers straightforward solo work.
- Standard ($5/user/mo): Adds unlimited boards and Power-Ups, so you can integrate more tools into your workflow.
- Premium ($10/user/mo): Unlocks timeline, calendar, and dashboard views for better project visibility.
- Enterprise ($17.50/user/mo): Adds organization-wide controls and security for larger teams.
Asana Pricing (2026)
- Personal (Free): Supports up to 10 teammates with unlimited tasks, though you're restricted to list and board views only.
- Starter ($10.99/user/mo): Includes the timeline view and workflow builder so you can automate multi-phase projects.
- Advanced ($24.99/user/mo): Unlocks portfolios, workload management, and goals for high-level coordination.
The hidden cost of the tool stack
When you add up the subscriptions for a 5-person team, the project management fee is only the beginning. Since neither tool handles billing, you'll still be paying $40-75/month for a time tracker like Toggl and another $50-85/month for invoicing software like FreshBooks. Across your entire stack, you'll likely spend $140-215/month ... whereas all-in-one platforms like Plutio start at just $49/month for teams.
Which tool is better for your team type?
Choosing between Trello and Asana usually comes down to whether you prioritize instant Kanban simplicity or structured project timelines.
Solo freelancers
Trello covers basic visual workload tracking without over-complicating things. Trello gets you moving in minutes, but because Trello doesn't handle the billing side of your business, you'll still be toggling between apps to get paid.
Small agencies (2-10 people)
Asana's timeline view helps agencies coordinate handoffs between designers and developers. You can see exactly how one delay ripples through the entire schedule, though you'll still be bridging the gap to your client's invoices manually.
Creative teams
Both tools handle production pipelines, but Trello's visual card covers often feel more natural for creative reviews where images and designs need quick visual context. Asana's list and board views organize the pipeline, but the emphasis is on structured task management rather than visual previews. However, while both handle internal tracking, neither tool lets you white-label the experience for clients or send proposals and invoices from the same platform.
Consultants and coaches
Consulting work usually involves billable hours, which makes both tools a stretch for the full billing workflow. Since neither tracks time natively, a separate time tracker like Toggl or Harvest runs alongside, and then those hours get manually copied into a separate invoicing app every month. For consultants billing 20-40 hours per week across multiple clients, the disconnect between task completion, time tracking, and invoicing creates a recurring admin burden that eats 1-2 hours per billing cycle. Platforms with task-level time tracking connected to invoicing handle the entire hours-to-invoice flow in one step.
Enterprise teams
Asana's portfolios and workload views provide the high-level visibility that larger organizations need to track multiple workstreams across departments. The Advanced plan at $24.99/user/month includes goals, custom fields, and approval workflows that help coordinate larger teams. But the per-user pricing adds up: a 20-person team on the Advanced plan costs $499.80/month. And since Asana still lacks native time tracking, invoicing, and client portals, enterprise teams layer additional tools on top, further increasing the total cost of the stack.
What both tools are missing
Trello and Asana both focus on internal coordination, but they share a few critical architectural gaps that can slow down a client-service business.
Time tracking that doesn't connect to billing
Neither tool tracks time natively, so an external app fills the gap. When billing time arrives, the process looks like: export hours from Toggl or Harvest, calculate totals per project, open FreshBooks or QuickBooks, create line items manually, and send the invoice. Each billing cycle takes 30-45 minutes per client. Across 15-20 clients per year, the manual transfer between time tracking and invoicing consumes 8-15 hours annually.
Proposals, contracts, and payments
The entire sales-to-billing cycle happens outside of Trello and Asana. Proposals go through one tool, e-signatures through another, and invoices through a third. Because these systems don't share data, every new client means re-entering project details across multiple platforms. A signed proposal doesn't automatically create a project in Trello, and a completed project in Asana doesn't generate an invoice. Each transition requires manual copying. Platforms with proposal-to-project workflows handle the full cycle without the data re-entry.
Non-branded client portals
Guest access lets clients see project boards or timelines, but the dashboard shows Trello or Asana's branding throughout. For agencies positioning premium services, clients logging into a third-party tool undermines the brand experience. Neither platform supports custom domains, branded login screens, or complete brand removal. Clients checking project status see the software vendor's logo rather than the agency's. White-labeled portals on custom domains let clients view projects, sign documents, and pay invoices under one brand without exposure to the underlying platform.
The communication scatter
Task comments work for internal project notes, but client conversations still happen in email, Slack, and text messages. When a client requests a change, the message sits in email while the task lives in Trello or Asana. Team members check two or three apps just to find the latest feedback. File requests come through email, approvals happen in a separate thread, and revision notes get scattered across platforms. Without client communication tied to the project record, context gets lost between tools, and tracking down a specific client request takes longer than the revision itself.
What users do when neither tool is enough
When Trello or Asana cannot handle the full workflow, users either build a multi-tool stack or switch to a platform designed for the complete client lifecycle.
The typical workaround stack
Most freelancers and agencies end up with something like:
- Trello or Asana for task management ($0-25/month)
- Toggl, Harvest, or Clockify for time tracking ($0-12/user/month)
- FreshBooks, QuickBooks, or Wave for invoicing ($0-25/month)
- HelloSign or DocuSign for contracts ($0-15/month)
- Google Drive or Dropbox for file sharing ($0-15/month)
The total comes to 4-5 subscriptions, 4-5 logins, and 4-5 places where data lives.
The hidden cost: copying data between tools
The subscription costs are visible. The hidden cost is the manual work. When you finish a task in Trello, you stop your Toggl timer. When the project ends, you export Toggl hours, calculate totals, create an invoice in FreshBooks, attach the exported time log, and send it to the client. Each handoff takes 5-15 minutes. Across 20 clients per year, that is 40+ hours annually on data transfer between apps.
The one-platform alternative
All-in-one platforms exist that handle task management, time tracking, proposals, and invoicing in a single system. The trade-off: learning a new tool versus maintaining your existing stack. For users already comfortable with Trello or Asana, migration feels like effort. For users drowning in tool-juggling, switching to one platform can recover 3-5 hours per week.
What one platform looks like
Plutio is one platform that covers the complete workflow. Tasks live in Kanban boards (like Trello) or list views. Time tracking happens at the task level-click Start, do the work, click Stop. When the project ends, tracked hours convert to invoice line items with one click. Clients access a portal under your domain to check status, approve work, and pay invoices. The comparison table below shows exactly where Plutio fills gaps that both Trello and Asana leave open.
Final verdict
Both tools organize work well, but the choice really comes down to how much project structure you need and whether you're tired of tool-juggling.
Trello leans toward:
- Visual Kanban boards with almost zero learning curve, but timeline views and Gantt charts are not included.
- Straightforward projects that don't require complex dependencies or multi-phase tracking.
- Lower per-user cost and a free tier that covers solo work, though time tracking and invoicing still require separate tools.
The trade-off: Trello focuses on simplicity, which means you'll hit a wall the moment you need timeline views or task-level time tracking.
Asana leans toward:
- Multi-phase projects with task dependencies, though the interface takes longer to learn than Trello.
- Timeline and portfolio views for workload tracking, but paid plans start at $10.99/user/month.
- Structured coordination over simplicity, and the budget needs to cover Asana's higher-tier plans plus separate billing tools.
The trade-off: Asana also stops at task management, so you'll still be paying for separate billing and portal apps to run the rest of your business.
Consider Plutio if:
- You're already using 3+ tools just to manage your projects, time, and billing.
- Manual data entry between apps is eating up several hours of your week.
- You want your clients to have a professional, white-labeled experience.
The bottom line: Trello is for Kanban speed, and Asana is for multi-phase structure. But if you're tired of copying data between apps and want a single platform to handle everything from task management to final invoice, Plutio bridges the gap between task management and billing.
Research & Sources
The Trello vs Asana comparison is based on direct hands-on testing, official documentation review, and analysis of user feedback across major platforms. All data verified January 2026.
Research methodology
Both tools were evaluated through active accounts, official feature documentation, and analysis of 1,000+ user reviews across G2, Capterra, and TrustRadius. Focus was on common pain points from 1-3 star reviews where users share honest limitations.
Platform ratings (January 2026)
- Trello: 4.4/5 on G2 (13,000+ reviews), praised for simplicity, criticized for limited project views and Power-Up dependency
- Asana: 4.4/5 on G2 (10,000+ reviews), praised for timeline and dependencies, criticized for pricing and complexity
- Plutio: 4.6/5 on G2 (200+ reviews), praised for all-in-one coverage and white-labeling
Common user complaints (from 1-3 star reviews)
Trello users frequently mention: "Limited to Kanban only," "Power-Ups get expensive," "No time tracking," "Not enough for complex projects"
Asana users frequently mention: "Too expensive for what you get," "Overwhelming interface," "No time tracking," "Learning curve is steep"
Pricing sources (verified January 2026)
Feature verification
- Trello G2 reviews (13,000+ reviews)
- Asana G2 reviews (10,000+ reviews)
If you find inaccuracies or outdated information, please let us know.
