Indy vs Dubsado pricing breakdown
Getting full-featured access to either platform costs between $18.75 and $40 per month, but the ceiling of what each tool delivers at that price differs significantly.
Indy Pricing (2026)
- Free: $0/month. Includes proposals, contracts, invoices, time tracking, and task boards, but capped at 3 per document type per month. Most active freelancers hit this limit within the first billing cycle.
- Pro: $25/month (monthly) or $18.75/month (billed annually at $225/year). Removes the document caps and unlocks unlimited proposals, contracts, and invoices. No team seats at any tier.
Dubsado Pricing (2026)
- Starter: $20/month (monthly) or $16.67/month (billed annually at $200/year). Limited to 3 active clients. Most users treat this as an extended trial before upgrading.
- Premier: $40/month (monthly) or $33.33/month (billed annually at $400/year). Unlimited projects, full Flows automation, CSS form customization, and team access.
The real cost: what users actually pay
The subscription price covers intake only. Most users add supplementary apps to handle what neither tool offers:
- Project management: Trello Free or Asana Starter ($0-$11/month)
- Time tracking (Dubsado only): Toggl or Clockify ($0-$9/month per user)
- File sharing: Google Drive or Dropbox ($0-$12/month)
A three-app stack typically runs $30-70 per month on top of the main subscription, plus the hidden overhead of copying data between systems. Platforms like Plutio start at $19/month for solo users with no feature gating: proposals, contracts, projects, time tracking, invoicing, and a white-labeled client portal in one subscription.
The verdict: Indy Pro at $18.75/month (annual) is cheaper than Dubsado Premier at $33.33/month (annual). But Dubsado includes team access that Indy never offers. If you need team seats and automation depth, Dubsado Premier is the only viable option between the two. If you are a solo freelancer on a budget and only need basic intake features with light time tracking, Indy Pro costs less.
Which tool is better for your business type?
The fundamental trade-off between Indy and Dubsado comes down to speed versus depth: Indy gets you sending proposals in a day with a free tier to test, while Dubsado requires weeks of setup to unlock the automation capabilities that justify its price.
Solo freelancers on a tight budget
Indy is the natural starting point. The free plan lets you test contracts, proposals, and invoicing before committing. Pro at $18.75/month covers the basics without overpaying for automation features you may not need. Dubsado's Starter plan caps at 3 clients and functions more as a trial than a real plan, so the cost of entry is effectively $40/month for Premier. For a new freelancer still building a client base, Indy's pricing structure fits better.
Freelancers with event-based project cycles
Both tools cover the single-transaction booking flow well: inquiry arrives, proposal goes out, contract gets signed, deposit gets collected. Indy handles this through basic templates. Dubsado handles it with conditional automation through Flows. The gap appears after the booking. Neither has timeline views or milestone dependencies for managing a 6-month event project from contract to delivery.
Consultants and hourly billing
Indy has basic time tracking that Dubsado completely lacks. For consultants who bill hourly for any portion of their work, Indy is the only viable option between these two. Dubsado requires a separate time tracking app and manual hour transfers into invoices, which adds a friction point every billing cycle. Platforms with task-level time tracking that connects directly to invoicing handle this workflow more completely.
Agencies and growing teams
Neither tool handles teams. Indy has no team plan at any price, which rules it out entirely for any business adding a second person. Dubsado Premier includes team access, but without role-based permissions. A contractor can see more than they need to. An assistant cannot be scoped to only their assigned tasks. For agencies managing multiple team members with different access needs, both tools show their solo-freelancer origins.
Brand-conscious service providers
Both tools run client portals on their own subdomains. Neither offers a custom domain option. For premium agencies and consultants whose client experience is part of the brand value, both tools expose the software vendor to clients. Dubsado has CSS form customization, which helps with branded intake forms, but the portal itself still shows Dubsado's subdomain. Indy has no comparable customization depth.
What both tools are missing
Indy and Dubsado both cover client intake: proposals, contracts, and invoices. But once the signature lands, most users find themselves opening two or three other apps to manage the actual work.
Project management stops at basic task lists
Both tools include task lists with due dates. Both stop there. Neither has Kanban boards for moving tasks through workflow stages, Gantt charts for timeline planning, subtasks with nesting, or task dependencies that shift automatically when a milestone slips. For a 3-day project, a checklist is enough. For a 3-month brand identity project with dependencies across deliverables, users open Trello or Asana and accept that project details now live in two places.
Time tracking that does not connect to the full workflow
Indy has a timer and manual time entry. You can generate invoices from time logs at the project level. But tracking stops at the project level, not the task level, so you cannot break down which specific tasks consumed your hours or set different rates per work type. Dubsado has no time tracking at all. Any hourly billing in Dubsado means a separate Toggl or Harvest account and manual hour transfers into invoices, adding 20-40 minutes per billing cycle per hourly client.
Client portals that show the software vendor
Neither tool supports a custom domain for the client portal. Indy clients see an Indy subdomain URL. Dubsado clients see a Dubsado subdomain. For service providers charging premium rates whose brand is part of the value, clients landing on the software vendor's URL undercuts the positioning. Platforms like Plutio support fully branded portals where clients see only your business name and domain.
No automatic subscription billing
Monthly retainers are common for consultants, coaches, and agencies. Neither Indy nor Dubsado supports automatic recurring charges. Recurring invoices can be scheduled to send automatically, but clients must manually pay each one, which means chasing payments, tracking who has paid, and dealing with delays. Platforms with built-in subscription billing handle automatic charges and payment recovery in the same system where the project lives.
No team access in Indy, limited team access in Dubsado
Indy has no team plan at any tier. If your business adds a second person, Indy cannot accommodate it. Dubsado Premier includes team members, but without role-based permissions. Every team member sees the same data regardless of their role. Neither tool lets you scope a contractor's access to only their assigned projects or restrict a bookkeeper to invoices only.
What users do when neither tool is enough
When Indy or Dubsado cannot handle the full workflow alone, users take one of two paths: build a multi-tool stack and accept the overhead, or move to a platform that covers the complete client lifecycle in one place.
The typical workaround stack
Most users who outgrow either tool end up with something like this:
- Indy or Dubsado for intake, proposals, and contracts ($0-$40/month)
- Trello, Asana, or ClickUp for project management ($0-$15/month)
- Toggl or Clockify for time tracking, Dubsado users especially ($0-$9/month per user)
- Stripe or FreshBooks for subscription billing and advanced invoicing ($0-$17/month)
- Google Drive or Dropbox for file sharing ($0-$12/month)
A typical four-app stack totals $30-90 per month in subscriptions, plus the time cost of moving data between each one.
The hidden cost: time spent on handoffs
The subscription spend is the visible expense. The hidden cost is the workflow friction. When a client signs a contract in Dubsado, someone has to manually create a Trello board, open Toggl to start tracking time, and then transfer hours into a Dubsado invoice at billing time. Each handoff takes 10-20 minutes. Across 15 active clients per year, that's 25-50 hours spent on data transfer that software should handle automatically.
The one-platform alternative
Platforms exist that handle intake, project management, time tracking, and invoicing in a single system. The trade-off is learning a new interface versus maintaining the existing stack. For users who have built Dubsado Flows or Indy templates, migration feels like a project. For users who are manually copying data between four apps every billing cycle, switching typically recovers 2-4 hours per week.
What one platform looks like in practice
If you are curious: Plutio is one platform that covers the complete workflow. Client inquiries flow into proposals and contracts. Signed contracts automatically create projects with Kanban boards and task templates. Time tracking happens at the task level and flows directly into invoices. Clients access a portal at your domain, not the software vendor's. The comparison table below shows exactly where Plutio fills the gaps that Indy and Dubsado leave open. The goal is not to push you toward Plutio specifically, but to show what a unified workflow can look like.
Final verdict: Indy vs Dubsado
Indy and Dubsado both handle client intake. Proposals, contracts, and invoices work in both. The differences emerge in pricing model, automation depth, and what happens after the booking.
Indy trade-offs:
- Free plan available for testing, but caps at 3 proposals, contracts, and invoices per month, which most active freelancers hit in the first billing cycle
- Basic time tracking exists, but tracks at the project level only, so hourly billing by task type still requires workarounds
- Setup takes most users a day or two, but customization depth is limited once you hit the template walls
- No team plan at any price, which rules it out entirely as soon as a second person needs their own login
But know that: Indy is the cheaper option at $18.75/month annually, and it includes time tracking that Dubsado lacks entirely. The solo ceiling is real and hard.
Dubsado trade-offs:
- Flows builder handles multi-step intake automation with conditional logic, but setup takes most users one to two weeks before the first proposal goes out
- CSS form customization gives brand control on intake forms, but requires coding knowledge and does not extend to the portal
- Team access comes on Premier, but without role-based permissions so contractors see more data than they need
- No time tracking at all, so any hourly billing requires a separate app and manual hour transfers every billing cycle
But know that: Dubsado Premier at $40/month is more than double Indy Pro for annual billing, and the main advantage is automation depth and team access. Both lack time tracking parity, project management beyond checklists, and custom domain portals.
Consider switching to one platform if:
- You already juggle three or more apps: intake in one, projects in another, time tracking in a third, invoicing in a fourth
- Manual data copying between apps is eating 2-4 hours of your week
- Your projects need Kanban boards, timelines, or task dependencies rather than flat checklists
- Your clients should see your domain when they log into their portal, not the software vendor's
- You need team access with proper permission scoping for contractors and assistants
But know that: Switching means learning a new system and migrating existing templates and client data. For most users, this takes a focused weekend. The ongoing time savings typically recover that investment within a month.
The bottom line: Indy sets up fast and includes time tracking, but caps you at the solo tier with no team plan and no custom domain portal. Dubsado has a workflow builder for multi-step intake automation, but takes weeks to configure and has no time tracking. Both handle proposals and contracts but stop short of project delivery, client portal branding, and team collaboration. If your workflow already spans multiple tools and you want to see what one connected app looks like, the comparison table below shows how platforms like Plutio stack up against both.
Research & Sources
This comparison is based on direct hands-on testing, official documentation review, and analysis of user feedback across major review platforms. All data was verified in March 2026.
Research methodology
Each tool was evaluated through active trial accounts, official feature documentation, and analysis of 300+ user reviews across G2, Capterra, and Product Hunt. The focus was on common pain points appearing in 3-star and below reviews, where users share honest limitations rather than promotional material.
Platform ratings (March 2026)
- Indy: 4.7/5 on G2 (50+ reviews), praised for ease of use and all-in-one coverage for solos, criticized for document caps on the free plan and missing team features
- Dubsado: 4.3/5 on G2 (140+ reviews), praised for Flows automation and CSS form control, criticized for steep learning curve, no time tracking, and poor mobile experience
- Plutio: 4.6/5 on G2 (200+ reviews), praised for all-in-one coverage and white-labeling
Common user complaints (from 1-3 star reviews)
Indy users frequently mention: "Free plan too limited," "No team plan," "Customization is basic," "No mobile app"
Dubsado users frequently mention: "Took weeks to set up," "No time tracking at all," "Interface is overwhelming," "Mobile experience is poor"
Pricing sources (verified March 2026)
- Indy: Official pricing page
- Dubsado: Official pricing page
- Plutio: Official pricing page
Feature verification
If you find any inaccuracies or outdated information, please let us know so we can investigate and update.
